This article has been featured in the March-April issue of the North American Clean Energy Magazine.

The standardization of the solar industry is crucial to its success. With a push towards cleaner, greener energy sources, ensuring a common data standard for all participants will allow the solar industry to achieve its potential, providing benefits to society as a whole.
One way to help standardize data and enable process automation in the solar industry is through the use of Solar Automated Permit Processing Plus. SolarAPP+ is an online permitting platform that helps streamline the permitting process for solar projects. The platform includes a library of standard permit templates that can be used by jurisdictions across the United States.
Improving solar permitting is a collaborative effort. This work is supported by funding from the U.S. Department of Energy; the DOE’s Orange Button Working Group seeks to create a commonly accepted data structure to aid in the development of solar industry applications, in an effort to ease the process of integration through this standardization. NREL is working with a variety of partners to deliver the SolarAPP+ online platform. The platform was created to help address the permitting challenges faced by solar installers and developers, aiming to decrease the amount of time and complexity that inherently exists in the current fractured permitting processes used across thousands of Authorities Having Jurisdiction (AHJs).
To date, SolarAPP+ has been used to streamline the permitting process for thousands of solar installation projects. The platform has also been recognized by the DOE as a Best Practice for Solar Permitting — they are actively promoting and incentivizing adoption through programs such as the SolarAPP+ Prize, which rewards AHJ’s with up to $15,000 to lower the cost of adopting SolarAPP+.
How SolarAPP+ Works
SolarAPP+ provides local governments and AHJs with a standardized permit application portal for receiving and processing information for residential and commercial solar storage systems. The standardizations can be incorporated into the existing processes and procedures currently used by approval authorities. The technology can assist approvers with electronically reviewing the relevant safety and building code compliance requirements. If all checks are in order, authorities can instantly approve applications, lessening the burden of manually reviewing applications.
The app also gives applicants access to a streamlined application submission form that includes all of the required information for a permit application. After an application has been submitted, applicants receive notifications on the status of their application via email or text.
Is SolarAPP+ Mandatory?
Solar Access Act SB 379, which passed on August 24, 2022, mandates the use of SolarAPP+, or a similar type of online permitting tool, for California counties with over 150,000 residents. It is hoped that this legislation will pave the way for more states to introduce similar mandates, in an effort to improve the solar application process countrywide.
In other states, the use of SolarAPP+ is voluntary, but SEIA and NREL encourage its use. SEIA also offers a free SolarAPP+ Training Academy to help jurisdictions and developers learn how to use the platform. In the future, SolarAPP+ aims to be the gold standard when it comes to solar permit approval processes and hopes to achieve 100 percent penetration across every state.
What are the benefits of using SolarAPP+?
How CasinosInstantWithdrawal Explains Withdrawal Processing Times in Canadian Online Gambling
Withdrawal processing times remain one of the most frequently misunderstood aspects of online gambling in Canada. Players often assume that once they click “withdraw,” the money should appear in their account within minutes, but the reality involves a layered sequence of verification steps, payment network schedules, and regulatory obligations that can stretch timelines from a few hours to several business days. Understanding why these delays occur — and what distinguishes a genuinely fast withdrawal from a slow one — requires looking closely at how Canadian-licensed platforms actually process outgoing funds, and what standards have emerged to help players set realistic expectations.
The Regulatory Framework Shaping Withdrawal Timelines in Canada
Canada’s online gambling landscape operates under a patchwork of provincial and federal oversight rather than a single unified regulatory body. Provinces including Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, and Quebec have each developed their own frameworks for licensed gambling operations. Ontario’s iGaming market, which formally launched in April 2022 under the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (AGCO) and its market conduct standards operator iGO, represents the most significant structural shift the country has seen in decades. That regulatory environment directly affects withdrawal processing because licensed operators in Ontario must comply with Anti-Money Laundering (AML) requirements under the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act, administered federally by FINTRAC.
FINTRAC compliance requires operators to conduct enhanced due diligence on transactions above certain thresholds, typically $10,000 CAD for single transactions, though patterns of smaller transactions can also trigger review. This means that before a withdrawal is released, the platform’s compliance team may need to verify that the funds being withdrawn are consistent with the player’s deposit history, identity verification status, and documented source of funds. A player who has completed full Know Your Customer (KYC) verification — submitting government-issued ID, proof of address, and in some cases proof of payment method ownership — will experience significantly shorter withdrawal queues than one who hasn’t completed these steps. Many players are surprised to discover that KYC delays, not payment network delays, are the primary reason their first withdrawal from a new platform takes three to five business days.
Provincially run platforms such as PlayNow in British Columbia and Mise-o-jeu in Quebec operate under government ownership, which introduces additional bureaucratic layers but also provides stronger consumer protections. Withdrawal timelines on these platforms tend to be more predictable but somewhat slower than private operators, partly because government entities process payments in batches rather than continuously. Private operators licensed through the AGCO in Ontario or holding offshore licenses recognized under earlier provincial frameworks often have more flexible payment infrastructure, enabling them to process withdrawals outside standard banking hours.
How Payment Methods Determine Processing Speed
The payment method a player selects is arguably the single largest variable in withdrawal timing, more so than the platform’s internal processing speed. E-wallets such as Interac e-Transfer, PayPal, Skrill, and Neteller have become the dominant withdrawal channels in the Canadian market precisely because they operate outside traditional banking settlement cycles. Interac e-Transfer, in particular, has become the preferred withdrawal method for Canadian players because it processes through a real-time rail that allows funds to arrive within minutes once the operator releases the payment. The Interac network processes billions of dollars in transactions annually across Canada, and its integration with virtually every major Canadian financial institution means there is no intermediary bank correspondent delay of the kind that affects international wire transfers.
Credit and debit card withdrawals, by contrast, are subject to the card network’s own settlement schedules. Visa and Mastercard withdrawals to Canadian accounts typically take three to five business days to appear as available funds, even if the operator processes the withdrawal immediately. This is because card networks batch and settle transactions on defined cycles, and refunds or payouts to cards go through an authorization-and-settlement process that doesn’t operate in real time. Some players confuse the “pending” status visible in their online banking with a delay caused by the casino, when in fact the operator has already released the funds and the delay lies entirely within the card network’s settlement infrastructure.
Bank wire transfers represent the slowest option and are generally used only for large withdrawals where e-wallet limits would be prohibitive. Wire transfers between Canadian financial institutions typically settle within one to two business days domestically, but international wires — which may be involved when a player’s casino account is held by an entity registered in Malta, Gibraltar, or another jurisdiction — can take three to seven business days and involve correspondent banking fees. Cryptocurrency withdrawals occupy the opposite end of the spectrum: blockchain-based transactions can confirm within minutes for networks like Litecoin or within an hour or two for Bitcoin, depending on network congestion and the miner fee attached to the transaction. As of 2023 and into 2024, cryptocurrency adoption among Canadian online casino players has grown steadily, particularly among users who prioritize withdrawal speed over the familiarity of traditional banking channels.
Resources that track and compare withdrawal performance across operators have become increasingly valuable as the market has grown more complex. The platform casinos-instant-withdrawal.com, for instance, compiles withdrawal speed data and payment method availability across operators accessible to Canadian players, giving users a reference point for understanding which platforms consistently release funds within the same day versus those with multi-day internal processing queues — a distinction that isn’t always transparent from an operator’s own terms and conditions page.
Internal Processing Queues and What Operators Don’t Always Disclose
Beyond payment network timelines and regulatory compliance checks, operators maintain internal processing queues that add another layer of delay. Most platforms distinguish between “withdrawal requested,” “withdrawal approved,” and “withdrawal processed” as separate status milestones. The time between a player submitting a withdrawal request and the operator actually transmitting the funds to the payment network is referred to as the internal processing time, and this is where significant variation exists between platforms.
Some operators process withdrawals manually, meaning a member of the payments team must review and approve each transaction individually. This approach is common among smaller platforms and those that prioritize fraud prevention, but it means withdrawals submitted outside business hours — evenings, weekends, or Canadian public holidays — may sit in queue until the next business day. Larger, more technically sophisticated operators have implemented automated withdrawal processing systems that can approve and transmit payments around the clock without human intervention, provided the transaction falls within predefined risk parameters and the player’s KYC status is current.
The industry has seen a meaningful shift toward automation since approximately 2020, accelerated by the competitive pressure of Ontario’s regulated iGaming market launching in 2022. Operators competing for Ontario players understood that withdrawal speed was a significant differentiator, and several invested in payment processing infrastructure upgrades specifically to reduce internal queue times. CasinosInstantWithdrawal has documented this shift through its ongoing tracking of operator performance, noting that platforms which previously had 24-to-48-hour internal processing windows have in many cases reduced these to under two hours for verified players.
Pending periods — sometimes called “reverse withdrawal” windows — are another internal mechanism that players frequently encounter without fully understanding their purpose. During a pending period, typically ranging from 12 to 48 hours depending on the operator’s terms, a withdrawal can be reversed by the player and returned to their account balance. Operators introduced pending periods partly as a responsible gambling tool, giving players an opportunity to reconsider large withdrawals, but they also serve the operator’s interest by allowing time to flag potentially fraudulent transactions. Once the pending period expires without cancellation, the withdrawal moves into the active processing queue. Players who are unaware of this mechanism sometimes assume their withdrawal is being processed immediately, then become confused when funds don’t arrive for a day or more after submission.
Responsible Gambling Obligations and Their Effect on Withdrawal Timing
Canada’s expanding responsible gambling framework has introduced additional procedural requirements that can affect withdrawal timelines in ways players don’t always anticipate. Under the AGCO’s standards for Ontario-licensed operators, platforms are required to implement tools including deposit limits, self-exclusion programs, and reality checks. When a player has self-excluded and subsequently attempts to withdraw funds from an account that was active prior to exclusion, the operator must follow a specific procedure to verify the player’s identity and ensure the withdrawal is legitimate before releasing funds. This process can add several business days to what would otherwise be a routine withdrawal.
Similarly, operators are required under responsible gambling frameworks to conduct source-of-funds checks when withdrawal amounts are disproportionate to a player’s documented income or when patterns suggest potential problem gambling behavior. These checks are not punitive; they are compliance requirements that protect both the player and the operator. However, they do introduce delays that the player may experience as unexplained holds on their withdrawal. Platforms that communicate clearly about these requirements — explaining why additional documentation is needed and providing a timeline for resolution — tend to receive better player feedback than those that simply place a withdrawal on hold without explanation.
The AGCO has also implemented requirements around how operators communicate withdrawal timelines to players. Operators must clearly disclose estimated processing times in their terms and conditions and cannot advertise “instant withdrawals” unless they can substantiate that claim with actual performance data for the majority of transactions. This regulatory pressure on advertising claims has pushed some operators to invest in genuinely faster infrastructure rather than simply marketing faster speeds without delivering them. CasinosInstantWithdrawal has tracked how these disclosure requirements have changed operator behavior since Ontario’s regulated market launched, observing a general trend toward more conservative and accurate withdrawal time estimates in operator marketing materials.
Tax obligations represent another dimension of withdrawal processing that Canadian players sometimes overlook. Canada does not impose a federal income tax on gambling winnings for recreational players, as the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) considers gambling winnings to be windfalls rather than income in most circumstances. However, professional gamblers — those who earn gambling income as a primary source of livelihood — may have reporting obligations. For the vast majority of recreational players, tax considerations do not affect withdrawal processing. Where they do become relevant is for players who receive large promotional bonuses or participate in tournaments with prize pools, as some operators are required to issue documentation for certain types of promotional income. Operators must navigate these requirements carefully, and in some cases, compliance review of a large withdrawal may include confirming the source of funds and the nature of the winnings before releasing payment.
Understanding the full picture of withdrawal processing in Canadian online gambling — from the regulatory obligations that drive KYC requirements to the payment network mechanics that determine how quickly funds reach a player’s account — allows players to make more informed decisions about where they play and what withdrawal method they select. Platforms that invest in automated processing infrastructure, maintain clear KYC procedures that allow players to complete verification before their first withdrawal, and offer Interac e-Transfer as a withdrawal channel are structurally positioned to deliver faster payouts than those relying on manual review and traditional banking channels. The gap between a same-day withdrawal experience and a five-business-day wait is rarely arbitrary; it reflects deliberate choices by operators about compliance infrastructure, payment partnerships, and the priority they assign to player experience at the point of withdrawal. As Ontario’s regulated market matures and other provinces consider similar frameworks, the standards around withdrawal transparency and processing speed are likely to continue evolving, with player expectations rising alongside regulatory scrutiny of how operators handle outgoing funds.
Time Saving
The SolarAPP+ platform can save developers time by providing access to a library of pre-approved permit templates. This can help to reduce time spent on the permitting process, from months down to days, in some cases.
Decreased Costs
By using SolarAPP+, developers can avoid having to hire third-party consultants and expediters to manage the solar permit application process. This will help to decrease costs associated with the permitting process.
Increased Efficiency
SolarAPP+ can streamline the permitting process by automating many of the tasks that are typically carried out manually, such as collecting signatures, sending notifications, and generating reports.
Improved Accuracy
SolarAPP+ can help improve the accuracy and avoid delays of solar permits by ensuring that all required information is captured and validated before the permit application is submitted.
Standardization is Critical to the Success of Our National Climate Change Action Plan
The United States has committed to reducing its greenhouse gas emissions by 26-28% below 2005 levels by 2025, as part of the Paris Climate Agreement. In order to achieve this goal, it is critical that the solar industry is standardized to remove unnecessary roadblocks and red tape, allowing for greater and faster uptake of clean energy solutions.
Solar energy is a key component of our national climate change action plan. It is a clean, renewable resource that can help us to reduce our reliance on fossil fuels and meet our climate change goals. SolarAPP+ is an important tool that can help us to achieve these goals adding a level of sophistication and simplicity that has never been seen before at scale.
Partnering with All Stakeholders
In order to achieve its goal of 100 percent penetration across the United States, SolarAPP+ is partnering with all industry stakeholders, including:
- Solar Technology Developers and Manufacturers
- Solar Installers and Contractors
- Utility Companies
- Investor-Owned Utilities (IOUs)
- Electric Cooperatives (co-ops)
- Public Utility Commissions (PUCs)
The Future is SolarAPP+
The solar industry is booming, and is expected to continue to grow exponentially in the coming years. SolarAPP+ is leading the way in simplifying and streamlining the solar permitting process, making it easier than ever for developers to get their projects off the ground. In the future, SolarAPP+ aims to be the go-to platform for all solar permit applications.
The author is Jaclyn Haynes, Marketing Manager at Blu Banyan, a technology consulting firm that specializes in developing custom software solutions for the solar industry using NetSuite- a cloud-based business management platform. We have a team of experienced developers and solar industry experts who are passionate about building innovative applications that make a difference to our world.

